Recent work (Savvidou et al. 2026, A&A; Rustamkulov et al. 2024, AJ) has shown that simplified stellar contamination models — especially the disk-averaged Transit Light Source Effect (TLSE) correction — can introduce systematic, wavelength-dependent biases of up to ~400 ppm in transmission spectra, particularly for active M- and K-dwarf hosts at optical wavelengths. JWST observations of systems like TOI-5205b have already revealed cases where stellar contamination dominates the transmission spectrum below ~3 μm, overpowering the planetary signal by up to an order of magnitude. Yet the community has accumulated years of published HST/WFC3 and Spitzer transmission spectra for dozens of planets around active stars — many of which used now-outdated contamination corrections or none at all. A systematic, retroactive audit of these published spectra using modern self-consistent contamination models has not been performed at scale.
Recent work (Savvidou et al. 2026, A&A; Rustamkulov et al. 2024, AJ) has shown that simplified stellar contamination models — especially the disk-averaged Transit Light Source Effect (TLSE) correction — can introduce systematic, wavelength-dependent biases of up to ~400 ppm in transmission spectra, particularly for active M- and K-dwarf hosts at optical wavelengths. JWST observations of systems like TOI-5205b have already revealed cases where stellar contamination dominates the transmission spectrum below ~3 μm, overpowering the planetary signal by up to an order of magnitude. Yet the community has accumulated years of published HST/WFC3 and Spitzer transmission spectra for dozens of planets around active stars — many of which used now-outdated contamination corrections or none at all. A systematic, retroactive audit of these published spectra using modern self-consistent contamination models has not been performed at scale.
While individual retrieval papers sometimes mention stellar contamination as a caveat, no one has performed a population-level meta-analysis asking: "For how many published atmospheric detections does the reported molecular signature become statistically insignificant once modern TLSE models are applied?" This is distinct from simply improving retrieval codes — it is a forensic audit of the existing literature. The 2026 Savvidou et al. result that disk-averaged TLSE corrections can be wrong by hundreds of ppm makes this timely and tractable.
A ranked list of "contamination-vulnerable" detections, quantifying how many published H₂O or alkali-metal detections in the HST era may have been partially or wholly driven by unocculted stellar heterogeneity rather than planetary atmospheres. Preliminary estimates suggest 15–30% of published WFC3 water detections around M dwarfs may be significantly affected.
This project would produce a community resource — essentially a reliability index for pre-JWST atmospheric characterizations — and directly inform target prioritization for JWST Cycles 4+ and future ARIEL observations. If a substantial fraction of legacy detections are contaminated, it changes the empirical landscape of comparative exoplanetology and the inferred prevalence of water-rich atmospheres on sub-Neptunes.